GRE · Analytical Writing: Argument Essay · Brazil
Analytical Writing: Argument Essay for the GRE Exam — Brazilian candidates
5% of the GRE test plan. The Argument Essay asks you to identify and explain the logical flaws, unwarranted assumptions, and missing evidence in a provided argument — not to give your own opinion on the topic. Calibrated for Brazilian candidates.
If you have already studied this content from a textbook, you know the material. The question this page answers is whether you can apply it under exam conditions. Analytical Writing: Argument Essay sits at roughly 5% of the Graduate Record Examinations content distribution — The Argument Essay is the second Analytical Writing task, also 30 minutes. Unlike the Issue Essay, you are not asked for your opinion — you are asked to critique the logical structure of a given argument. ETS evaluates whether you can identify unstated assumptions, logical fallacies (correlation/causation, hasty generalization, false analogy, slippery slope, circular reasoning), missing evidence, and alternative explanations. This tests skills directly relevant to graduate-level research and professional reasoning. Pass rates for the GRE are published annually by the awarding body and vary by cohort and locale. For Brazilian candidates preparing for GRE, the calibration of study to local context matters: ENEM is Brazil's national entrance exam. For international study, IELTS and TOEFL dominate; CDL US licensure is a growing cross-border opportunity.
Common failure modes
These are the patterns that cause most candidates to lose marks on this topic. Recognising them in advance is half the work.
- !Writing your own position on the topic instead of critiquing the argument's logic — a fundamental misunderstanding of the task
- !Identifying only one flaw when three to four substantive logical errors are expected for a top score
- !Describing flaws superficially ("this is a weak argument") without explaining the precise logical error and how it undermines the conclusion
- !Missing the alternative explanations that could account for the evidence presented — ETS specifically rewards alternative-explanation analysis
Study tips
- 1Build a checklist of the eight most common GRE Argument Essay logical flaws: (1) correlation/causation, (2) hasty generalization, (3) false analogy, (4) unrepresentative sample, (5) circular reasoning, (6) either/or fallacy, (7) appeal to authority, (8) temporal assumption (past conditions = present conditions).
- 2Practice the Argument Essay structure: (1) brief intro identifying the argument's conclusion, (2) three body paragraphs each identifying one specific flaw with an explanation and an alternative, (3) concise conclusion.
- 3Write the word "BECAUSE" between the evidence and the conclusion in the argument — then ask whether that causal or logical link is actually established. If not, that gap is a flaw.
- 4Practice with ETS's published pool of Argument Essay prompts (available on ETS website) — they follow consistent structural patterns once you've seen 10–15 examples.
- 5Brazilian candidates preparing for GRE should account for visa-processing timelines if testing abroad — most U.S. test centres require a B1/B2 visa appointment scheduled 90+ days in advance.
Sample GRE Analytical Writing: Argument Essay questions
These sample items mirror the format and difficulty of real GRE questions. Practice with thousands more on the free Koydo question bank.
- 1
Argument Essay prompt: "The number of tourists visiting Millbrook has increased significantly since the new art museum opened three years ago. Therefore, the town should build another museum in order to continue increasing tourism revenue." Which of the following is the most significant logical flaw in this argument?
- AThe argument assumes the relationship is causal, not merely correlationalCorrect
- BThe argument relies on anecdotal evidence from a single case
- CThe argument does not consider whether the town has the budget to build another museum
- DThe argument contradicts itself by using the word "continue"
Why this answer?
The core flaw is the assumption of causation from correlation. Tourism may have increased for reasons unrelated to the museum (economic growth, other attractions, currency exchange rates). The conclusion that building another museum will increase tourism assumes a causal mechanism that has not been established. The argument also makes a false analogy by assuming that a second museum will have the same effect as the first. (Illustrative.)
Frequently asked questions
Is the Argument Essay harder than the Issue Essay?
How long should my GRE essays be?
What is the GRE pass rate for Brazilian candidates?
How long should Brazilian candidates study Analytical Writing: Argument Essay for the GRE?
Practice GRE Verbal & Quant free with Koydo.
Adaptive practice, 4,000+ questions, AWA scoring built-in.
Related study guides
- Verbal: Text Completion for GRE (Brazil)Another GRE topic for Brazilian candidates
- Verbal: Sentence Equivalence for GRE (Brazil)Another GRE topic for Brazilian candidates
- Verbal: Reading Comprehension for GRE (Brazil)Another GRE topic for Brazilian candidates
- Quantitative: Arithmetic for GRE (Brazil)Another GRE topic for Brazilian candidates
- Quantitative: Algebra for GRE (Brazil)Another GRE topic for Brazilian candidates
- Analytical Writing: Argument Essay for GRE — U.S. candidatesSame Analytical Writing: Argument Essay topic, different locale framing
- Analytical Writing: Argument Essay for GRE — U.K. candidatesSame Analytical Writing: Argument Essay topic, different locale framing
- Analytical Writing: Argument Essay for GRE — Indian candidatesSame Analytical Writing: Argument Essay topic, different locale framing
Regulatory citation: ETS GRE General Test — Analytical Writing measure scoring guide.